Bull details |
|
| Basic information | |||
| Name |
 |
||
| 2J DIRECTOR 27F | |||
| Breed | Ear-tag No. | ||
| Aberdeen angus | 0 | ||
| State register | Herd-Book No. | ||
| ZAA 247 | 851993 | ||
| Country of origin | Birth date | ||
| Canada | 01.03.1996 | ||
| DNA | Blood | ||
| DNA 401730 | 4606/38 | ||
| Breeder | Owner |
| J & J Easton Wawota SK | |
| Statut | |
| bull not alive | |
| Performance data | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | Weight - date of selection (kg) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Daily weight gain at test period (g) | Daily weight gain at test period (EBV) | Daily weight gain since birth (g) | Height at rump at age of 365 days (cm) | Height at rump - date of selection (cm) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Test station: | Date of selection: | ||||
| Linear scoring | ||||||||||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Relative breeding value: 99 | Relative breeding value: 96 | Relative breeding value: 96 | Relative breeding value: 97 | |||||||
Explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
Linear scoring - EBV
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
104
HG
97
LB
95
WT
99
CO
96
BC
96
MU
97
BT
| Breeding values | |||||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | Calculation date: | 30.06.2023 | ||
| Calves: | 174 | ||||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth | Herds: | 4 |
| 102/94 | 103/96 | 127/85 | 99/87 | Calves weighted: | 161 |
| Calved daughters: | 46 | ||||
Direct effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
108
Calv. ease
95
Birth weight
102
SI CAE
102
120 days
105
210 days
102
365 days
103
SI GR
Direct/Maternal effect explanation:
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
Maternal effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
116
Calv. ease
137
Birth weight
127
SI CAE
97
120 days
96
210 days
104
365 days
99
SI GR
Population average comparison :
| ZAA 247 | Average | Difference | |
| Direct effect - calving ease | 102 | 102 | 0 |
| Direct effect - growth | 103 | 116 | -13 |
| Maternal effect - calving ease | 127 | 91 | +36 |
| Maternal effect - growth | 99 | 104 | -5 |
| Pedigree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not familiar with Czech selection/performance system, we recommend to read Selection system article first.
Detailed information of Czech methodology can be downloaded in here. Data of owners are taken from the central evidence of CMSCH, a.s. This is therefore the name of the holding to which the bull was moved within the central evidence. |