Bull details |
|
| Basic information | |||
| Name |
 |
||
| ERIK | |||
| Breed | Ear-tag No. | ||
| Aberdeen angus | 298117 CZ | ||
| State register | Herd-Book No. | ||
| AAP 062 | 190117000298 | ||
| Country of origin | Birth date | ||
| Czechia | 05.04.1995 | ||
| DNA | Blood | ||
| 4539/38 | |||
| Breeder | Owner |
| Vrchovanka s.r.o.Lično | Vrchovanka s.r.o.Lično |
| Statut | |
| bull not alive | |
| Performance data | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | Weight - date of selection (kg) | |
| 35 | 0 | 249 | 499 | 0 | |
| Daily weight gain at test period (g) | Daily weight gain at test period (EBV) | Daily weight gain since birth (g) | Height at rump at age of 365 days (cm) | Height at rump - date of selection (cm) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Test station: | Date of selection: | ||||
| Linear scoring | ||||||||||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Relative breeding value: 106 | Relative breeding value: 97 | Relative breeding value: 96 | Relative breeding value: 98 | |||||||
Explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
Linear scoring - EBV
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
112
HG
103
LB
102
WT
106
CO
97
BC
96
MU
98
BT
| Breeding values | |||||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | Calculation date: | 31.03.2024 | ||
| Calves: | 110 | ||||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth | Herds: | 1 |
| 103/84 | 97/86 | 95/69 | 116/70 | Calves weighted: | 99 |
| Calved daughters: | 24 | ||||
Direct effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
105
Calv. ease
100
Birth weight
103
SI CAE
97
120 days
99
210 days
95
365 days
97
SI GR
Direct/Maternal effect explanation:
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
Maternal effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
109
Calv. ease
80
Birth weight
95
SI CAE
119
120 days
117
210 days
113
365 days
116
SI GR
Population average comparison :
| AAP 062 | Average | Difference | |
| Direct effect - calving ease | 103 | 102 | +1 |
| Direct effect - growth | 97 | 116 | -19 |
| Maternal effect - calving ease | 95 | 91 | +4 |
| Maternal effect - growth | 116 | 104 | +12 |
| International evaluation - Interbeef: | |||
| values | adjusted weaning weight (AWW) | calving ease (CAE) | birth weight (BWT) |
| EBV direct effect: | 79 | 62 | 97 |
| Accuracy direct effect: | 88% | 89% | 82% |
| No. of progeny weighted: *1) | 72 | 89 | 89 |
| Performance: | yes | yes | yes |
| EBV maternal effect: | 127 | 122 | 98 |
| Accuracy - maternal effect: | 60% | 62% | 54% |
| Number of daughters: *2) | 15 | 21 | 21 |
| Number of daughter's progeny performances: *3) | 60 | 87 | 87 |
Interbeef data valid to: 18.03.2024
Interbeef data explanation:
Performance: yes/no - was/wasn't involved to the evaluation
*1) - Number of weighted progeny in the international evaluation
*2) - stated if the sire has more than 14 daughters
*3) - stated if the sire's daughters has more than 25 progeny
*1-3) - weights within the international evaluation included only
| Pedigree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not familiar with Czech selection/performance system, we recommend to read Selection system article first.
Detailed information of Czech methodology can be downloaded in here. Data of owners are taken from the central evidence of CMSCH, a.s. This is therefore the name of the holding to which the bull was moved within the central evidence. |