Details |
|
| Basic information | |||
| Name |
 |
||
| Breed | Ear-tag No. | ||
| Aberdeen angus | 196669932 CZ | ||
| Herd-Book No. | Statut | ||
| 087000196669932 | female not alive | ||
| Country of origin | Birth date | ||
| Czechia | 25.02.2007 | ||
| DNA | Blood | ||
| SNP 1908591M | |||
| Breeder | Owner |
| Šumavský angus spol.s r.o.Soběsuky | Šumavský angus spol.s r.o.Soběsuky |
| Performance data | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | ||
| 41 | 173 | 286 | 373 | ||
| Linear scoring | ||||||||||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | Evaluation date | |
| 7 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 74 |
| Relative breeding value: 107 | Relative breeding value: 107 | Relative breeding value: 106 | Relative breeding value: 106 | 04.10.2012 | ||||||
Explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
Linear scoring - EBV
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
102
HG
106
LB
112
WT
107
CO
107
BC
106
MU
106
BT
| Breeding values (31.03.2024) | |||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | ||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth |
| 101/68 | 114/77 | 99/60 | 90/67 |
Direct effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
100
Calv. ease
101
Birth weight
101
SI CAE
113
120 days
115
210 days
113
365 days
114
SI GR
Direct/Maternal effect explanation:
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
Maternal effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
91
Calv. ease
107
Birth weight
99
SI CAE
90
120 days
89
210 days
90
365 days
90
SI GR
Population average comparison :
| 196669932 CZ | Average | Difference | |
| Direct effect - calving ease | 101 | 100 | +1 |
| Direct effect - growth | 114 | 104 | +10 |
| Maternal effect - calving ease | 99 | 98 | +1 |
| Maternal effect - growth | 90 | 101 | -11 |
| International evaluation - Interbeef: | |||
| values | adjusted weaning weight (AWW) | calving ease (CAE) | birth weight (BWT) |
| EBV direct effect: | 109 | 95 | 106 |
| Accuracy direct effect: | 60% | 50% | 40% |
| No. of progeny weighted: *1) | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Performance: | yes | yes | yes |
| EBV maternal effect: | 109 | 111 | 106 |
| Accuracy - maternal effect: | 43% | 35% | 28% |
| Number of daughters: *2) | - | - | - |
| Number of daughter's progeny performances: *3) | - | - | - |
Interbeef data valid to: 18.03.2024
Interbeef data explanation:
Performance: yes/no - was/wasn't involved to the evaluation
*1) - Number of weighted progeny in the international evaluation
*2) - stated if the sire has more than 14 daughters
*3) - stated if the sire's daughters has more than 25 progeny
*1-3) - weights within the international evaluation included only
| Pedigree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not familiar with Czech selection/performance system, we recommend to read Selection system article first.
Detailed information of Czech methodology can be downloaded in here. Data of owners are taken from the central evidence of CMSCH, a.s. This is therefore the name of the holding to which the bull was moved within the central evidence. |