| Name | Breed |  |
|
| AJSHOJ SHUMAN | Aberdeen angus | ||
| State register | Herd-Book No. | Ear-tag No. | |
| ZAA 547 | 72251-01149 | 7225101149 DK | |
| Country of origin | Birth date | DNA | |
| Denmark | 09.04.2001 | DNA 6200053 | |
| Breeder | Blood | ||
| Rigmor & John Hansen, 8831 LÝgstrup | |||
| Owner | Statut | ||
| Šumavský angus s.r.o.Soběsuky | import of ID | ||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | Weight - date of selection (kg) |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daily weight gain at test period (g) | Daily weight gain at test period (EBV) | Daily weight gain since birth (g) | Height at rump at age of 365 days (cm) | Height at rump - date of selection (cm) |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Test station: | Date of selection: | |||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Relative breeding value: 103 | Relative breeding value: 95 | Relative breeding value: 93 | Relative breeding value: 95 | |||||||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | Calculation date | 31.03.2025 | ||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth | Calves | 13 |
| 100/63 | 102/71 | 98/50 | 95/56 | Herds | 2 |
| Má vlastní užitkovost (měřeno): | NE | Potomků s užitkovostí: | 0 | Zvíře má genotyp: | NE |
| znak | RPH (spolehlivost) |
působící populace | celá populace | naměřeno | ||
| průměr | percentil | průměr | percentil | |||
| Plocha nejdelšího zádového svalu | 103 (3%) | 102 | -- | 102 | -- | - |
| Podíl intramuskulárního tuku | 105 (2%) | 102 | -- | 101 | -- | - |
| Výška tuku na zádi | 104 (5%) | 101 | -- | 101 | -- | - |
| Výška tuku nad roštěncem | 105 (4%) | 102 | -- | 101 | -- | - |
| Hmotnost | 104 (4%) | 102 | -- | 102 | -- | - |
| values | adjusted weaning weight (AWW) | calving ease (CAE) | birth weight (BWT) |
| EBV direct effect: | 113 | 115 | 90 |
| Accuracy direct effect: | 75% | 72% | 79% |
| No. of progeny weighted: *1) | 89 | 250 | 250 |
| Performance: | yes | yes | yes |
| EBV maternal effect: | 118 | 90 | 98 |
| Accuracy - maternal effect: | 56% | 43% | 56% |
| Number of daughters: *2) | 39 | 93 | 93 |
| Number of daughter's progeny performances: *3) | 132 | 364 | 364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|